October 28, 2019 The ultrawideband 1-1000MHz NWDZ RF PA 2.0 – initial tests and improvements
For just about 10 USD including postal fees you can have the extraordinary ultra-wide band almighty QRP power amplifier: the only one you need for all the bands, HF to UHF.
Ordered two pieces via xab3.ro. Came in about 2 weeks. Looks very nice, small, but the soldering is kind of bad. First module tested died in the first day. The module was heating very rapidly if applied voltage was higher than about 9V, and did not applied more than 11V even if 15V is recommended for obtaining 3W output power. I inserted less than 10mW at the input- as specified, 5 to 145MHz.
I decided to investigate a bit the problem, and only some days after to test the second module. I first suspected that the first RF IC was dead (at the input). Later I discovered that the LDMOS output transistor (U2) has around 50ohms between Gate and Source when measured with a ohmmeter. So this transistor was lost. I removed it from the PCB, than measured the bias voltage. It was 3.55V. I think that is way too much (see why bellow).
In the following figure you can see the schematic of the module (i hope i did it well). Extremely to no information is present about this module on the net. I found that very probably U1 (marked on the first module as .BA5 and .BA5Z on the second) could be a SBA5089Z RF IC power driver with 13dbm output and 20db gain from DC to GHz, and U2 – marked K2 could be a RD01MUS1 (used also in FT991 PA) – a 1W/520Mhz/7.2V LDMOS. If true, U1 is quite well biased. In the first module, marking .BA5 it had 91mV drop on R2, so around 60mA. Datasheet specifies optimum of 80mA. In the second module we have a drop of 110mV on R2 which is supplying U1 (here is marked .BA5Z), that means ~ 73mA. Now moving to the U2, LDMOS, datasheet, application notes, FT991 PA schematic refer to an Idq of 35 to 100mA, as appropriate. That means a Vgs voltage of around 2.3~3V. The 3.55V is maybe a killer Vgs for this chinese implementation, moving the Idq to around >0.5A. So i’ve changed the bias resistors, as described in the following figure. This way i obtained an Idq of cca. 40mA. Also inserted a -1.3dB ATT pad at the input for better stability?! Now the module heats, but not more than abt. 30C.
At 11V supply, input of max. 1mW i can get on a 50 ohm load about 10V @ 5MHz (1W), 8 to 9V (700-800mW) till 55Mhz, abt. 9V at 145Mhz, and only 4V (200mW) at 432Mhz.
Fig. 1 – NWDZ RF PA v2.0 schematic and the first module tested
Update1: Measured C12 – 6pF; C11 – 270nF
Update 2: Just found some links about this or similar amps: http://m0taz.co.uk/2016/02/0dbm-1mw-output-wideband-amplifier/
Update 3: 432Mhz power increase
C11 was replaced by a ~ 12nH coil. Output voltage increased from 4V to 7-7.6V / 50 ohm, so more than 0.5W (@P.sup. = 12V). Input power less than a mW! Pictures below show the modified PA.
Tags: FT991, LDMOS, NWDZ, power amplifier, QRP, RD01MUS1, RF PA 2.0, RFIC, SBA5089Z, wideband
- 11 comments
- Posted under Uncategorized
Permalink #
Joe
said
Do you know the value of L3
Permalink #
Adrian
said
Hi Joe, L3 looks like just a SMD feritte bead
Permalink #
tony1tf
said
Thanks for this very useful post. I put a variable resistor across R6 to adjust the bias. I also destroyed the o/p FET by accidentally running with no load while testing a power feed via the input coax. Replaced with a RD01MUS2. I have built into a waterproof box so I can put it near my 70cm antenna and put a 3dB attenuator in the input but it oscillates at 600MHz or so with a supply of 11V or so. I am going to replace C11 by a resistor of a few ohm to make it more stable.
Permalink #
Adrian
said
Thanks for the comment. You may also try a RC negative feedback between RD01mus gate and drain, see ft991 predriver PA schematic..
Permalink #
tony1tf
said
Hi Adrian, Thanks for the suggestion. I had to search for some time to find the FT-991 technical manual, but eventually was able to get the component values for the feedback. Also I note that the stage has a 10 ohm resistor in the gate, which is was what I was going to do. I mounted the components on a sub-board because it was going to be difficult to directly replace parts on the NWDZ board, especially as I didn’t have a 10 ohm surface mount resistor and used two 4R7 in series. I would post a picture, but I don’t think I can in these comments. Anyway – first indications are that the instability has gone and the amplifier works fine with a bit less gain. I am mainly interested in using it at 70cm near my antenna, so it is mounted in a waterproof box, which is what started the instability problems.
There is surprisingly little data on this amp on the web, so it’s great that you started this blog. There must be lots of people using them because of the low price – especially as they are sold by Amazon, as well as eBay.
Thanks again
Tony
G3OVH
Permalink #
Adrian
said
Tony, now I understand better why you had instability… being a very high gain amp, if you place it very near the antenna, without shielding the amp, it’s obvious you get instability problems. Be carefull about the 10 ohms SMD resistor, if you want to try, then better use a single higher value, but dont use 2×4.7R THT as this could possibly work as an antenna…
Permalink #
tony1tf
said
I haven’t moved it near the antenna yet – that’s the next phase, and the box is screened. I was testing on a dummy load indoors. I am thinking of making a smaller sub board to carry the components, to make it even more stable.
Permalink #
Christian OE3CJB
said
Very nice post and I ran into the same issue – U2 died due to way to much heat. My U1 is a ECG055B from WJ communications marked as “E055G”. So I will try to do your modification on my two boards as well 🙂 73 OE3CJB
Permalink #
Adrian
said
Hello Christian and thank you very much for your feedback. GL with the mods and hope to hear about the new results! 73!
Permalink #
KB8NT
said
The tops of L1 & L2 on the units I received were smashed. I think the ferrite is just too brittle. I took them off the board and tried to measure them. If I did it right, I got a reading of about 5.2uH using a nanoVNA. Has anyone else tried measuring L1 & L2?
Permalink #
KB8NT
said
L1 & L2 may actually be 4.7uH. I found another 3W amplifier module on Amazon (DH-RF V2017) with 4.7uH leaded chokes in the same spots.